Chapter 7Environmental Assessments & Permitting
R11Clarification Needed

Apply or modify the Habitats Regulations to reduce costs whilst protecting the environment

Amend Habitats Regulations

Full Recommendation Text

Apply or modify the 2017 Habitats Regulations to:

  1. Remove the need to prove a negative when drawing a conclusion on impacts, so that the wording of the regulation refers to the need for scientific evidence and excludes merely hypothetical or speculative risks.
  2. Define 'compensatory measures' to expressly exclude the need for like-for-like compensation and instead accept that overall enhancement and measures to support the coherence of protected sites is sufficient.
  3. Establish that de minimis effects do not constitute an adverse effect on integrity, including where they have a de minimis contribution to in-combination effects with other projects.
  4. Legislate to remove the requirement for separate HRA assessments to be completed for each regulator at different stages, unless there has been a material change to a project. This could be achieved by "deeming" that the first assessment meets the tests of any subsequent approval unless there is a fundamental change in circumstances.
  5. Modify the 2017 Habitats Regulations, to allow mitigation measures to be considered at Stage 1 of the Habitats Regulations assessment process.
Update Timeline
Risk

Government Response: Habitats Regulations — mostly guidance, limited legislation

The Government is taking forward this recommendation through a combination of legislative and non-legislative measures, but is only legislating for one element: allowing mitigation to be considered at an earlier stage of the HRA process. The remaining four changes recommended by the Taskforce (removing need to prove a negative, redefining compensatory measures, establishing de minimis thresholds, and preventing duplicative HRA assessments) will be addressed through guidance only. The critical question is whether this guidance will have statutory underpinning — without it, the changes are vulnerable to legal challenge under retained EU law, which was a key reason the Taskforce recommended legislative reform in the first place.

Policy Paper • DESNZ, March 2026
Only one of five elements being legislated; guidance-only approach for remainder raises legal robustness concerns.
Ownership

Primary Owner

DEFRA

Key Regulators

Environment AgencyNatural England
Delivery Timeline
31 Dec 27

Taskforce target: December 2027

Scope

Sectors

civil

Domains

environmentallegislation
Implementation Type
primary legislationsecondary legislation
Dependencies

Enables

The content in this tracker is partially AI-generated based on the Nuclear Regulatory Taskforce report. We have worked hard to ensure it is accurate, but some of the titles, descriptions, etc. may be slightly different or truncated. If you find any errors or inaccuracies, please report them to us.